Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
I am sorry to ask the Minister again, but I think it is important we get to the bottom of this. Can she tell us why there is this change in approach? This was not the original plan, was it? If it was, this group of amendments would not be necessary. How does the presumption in favour of sustainable development work in the interim? For so long as those local plans and the regional spatial strategies which support them are in place, will they hold sway? That will obviously change the minute the plug is pulled, if it is, on the regional spatial strategies. I am interested to understand why and at what point it was decided to undertake these environmental assessments. Can the Minister confirm that what is being assessed is the consequence of the revocation of those strategies? It seems a fairly significant change in where we all thought we were heading and did not want to head.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c1772
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Climate change Countryside Brownfield sites Housing Local government Low incomes Planning permission Planning Property development Local plans Regional planning and development Sustainable development Renewable energy Wind power Travellers Rural areas Greenfield sites Carbon emissions Affordable housing
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:35:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_772451
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_772451
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_772451