Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
If the noble Baroness would forgive me, I am trying to understand the status of the NPPF in the interim before—or if—these strategies are revoked. Where does that leave the presumption over that period? It seems from what she said that there has been a legal challenge which, essentially, has forced the Government to go down this route. I therefore presume that this is not just a cosmetic exercise but is real; and the consequence could be that some strategies might be revoked and others not. Is that right? It seems to me to leave an entirely chaotic situation. Does the Minister recognise that it could lead us into a situation which nobody has contemplated or to date recognised?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c1773
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Climate change Countryside Brownfield sites Housing Local government Low incomes Planning permission Planning Property development Local plans Regional planning and development Sustainable development Renewable energy Wind power Travellers Rural areas Greenfield sites Carbon emissions Affordable housing
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:35:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_772453
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_772453
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_772453