Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Nick de Bois (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 October 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate, Backbench debate and e-petition debate on The Riots.


The Riots

I thank the hon. Lady; it is all too easy to focus on areas where there were riots, and not to recognise that there may be issues elsewhere. I welcome the work of Enfield council, where a cross-party team has been put together to try, essentially, to answer the question ““Why Enfield?”” Why was Enfield one of the areas hit by riots? Why did the participants choose to riot, and what was the make-up of the group of rioters? The youth offending service is undertaking excellent work with those who have offended, by talking to them and asking them those simple questions—not remotely or on paper, but in one-to-one interviews. That information will be made available to the Enfield council cross-party group, which I am sure is looking forward to seeing it. I still think we must be patient to understand fully what went on. There was tremendous unwanted and criminal behaviour, which should have been punished. The context—and I welcome the tone of today's debate—is that we are right to examine a little deeper the causes of what happened.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
533 c160WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Compensation Crime Courts Costs Police Prisons Young people Violence Reoffenders Civil disorder Gangs
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk