Proceeding contribution from Mark Prisk (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 20 October 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Arms Export Controls.
Arms Export Controls
The intention is to ensure that no inappropriate grants are made. Can I be absolutely sure that a system we devise will preclude any decision made that in due course we look back on and decide to revoke? It is difficult to say I can absolutely guarantee that. The intention is to hone that risk assessment, that categorisation, so that it is more sensitive, and perhaps to understand the changed political dimension in those countries, and therefore the lessons we may see in other countries as well. I am always wary of saying to the House, ““Never again”” or ,““This will absolutely guarantee that what some people may categorise as misjudgments may be made in the future.”” The intention, to which we will rightly be held to account by the House, is to ensure that we limit the opportunity for that kind of miscalculation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 533 c361-2WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Corruption Arms control Arms trade Licensing Export controls Treaties Weapons Torture Saudi Arabia Middle East Rendition Dual use goods and technologies Export Control Organisation
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:40:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775665
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775665
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775665