Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 24 October 2011. It occurred during Backbench debate on National Referendum on the European Union.


National Referendum on the European Union

About halfway through this evening's debate, it might be helpful to remind the House that the motion states:"““That this House calls upon the Government to introduce a Bill in the next session of Parliament to provide for the holding of a national referendum””." Do hon. Members remember national referendums? All three parties promised one in their 2005 election manifestos, and each came up with its unique way of reneging. The motion states that the referendum should be"““on whether the United Kingdom should""(a) remain a member of the European Union on the current terms;""(b) leave the European Union; or""(c) re-negotiate the terms of its membership in order to create a new relationship based on trade and co-operation.””" I must confess that when I first read that, I thought it would be extraordinarily difficult for anyone to disagree with a single word of it, whether they were for or against the EU.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
534 c102 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
EU withdrawal European Union EU internal trade Economic and monetary union EU internal relations Referendums Sovereignty UK membership of EU Government bills
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk