Proceeding contribution from Kelvin Hopkins (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 October 2011. It occurred during Opposition day on Environmental Protection and Green Growth.
Environmental Protection and Green Growth
Spending more, particularly in labour-intensive areas such as those we are debating today, would generate far more, through the multiplier effect, than the original investment, which we would get back through taxation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 534 c398
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Business Broadband Employment Flood control Environment protection Expenditure Food Economic growth Planning Recycling Waste management Renewable energy Technology Rural areas Carbon emissions
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:51:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777792
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777792
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777792