Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rosser (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.


London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill

In that case, I somewhat misunderstood the Minister’s reply, from which it appeared to me that there was some doubt as to whether someone involved in those networks would end up with a higher penalty. I think that she said that you can charge people only with the offence that they have committed. That rather suggested that she felt that it might not be possible to charge them with any offence other than the one in the Bill, under which a £20,000 fine is the limit. However, if the Minister is saying that where someone is apprehended who has been involved in running a network—and is the kind of individual who is seeing the ability to get ““easily into seven figures”” with money that could then be used ““for other illegal acts””—she would normally expect that such individuals would probably be charged with some other offence carrying a custodial sentence, that would certainly meet the point that I am making and the concern that I am expressing. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 6 withdrawn. Amendment 7 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c242-3GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Advertising Costs Licensing Greater London Fines Freight Police Public transport Newspaper press Proof of identity Marketing Taxis Schools Training Road traffic Roads Sports Touting Tickets London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority Olympic Games 2012 Paralympic Games 2012 Statutory instruments
Legislation
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk