Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Ribeiro (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Mawhinney for referring to the words, ““motherhood and apple pie””, because when I first saw this amendment, that is the way it looked. When one reads proposed subsections (1), (2)—or parts of it— (4), (5) and (6), they seem pretty innocuous. However, in proposed subsection (2), we are talking about high principles, which none of us would disagree with—principles which crop up time and again throughout the Bill. Quality—something that the noble Lord, Lord Darzi, referred to in a speech a few weeks ago —equity, integration, accountability are all points that we will address in the coming weeks, and are fundamental aspects of this Bill. However, the phrase ““not the market”” is not a principle—it is a mechanism for delivering what one wants. The noble Lord, Lord Peston, said that any form of market would turn the NHS into a privatised industry. May I remind him that during the time of the previous Administration, we had independent sector treatment centres? What were they if not an example of a market-driven industry? They were introduced—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c672 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Health Health services Finance Education Health professions NHS Ministerial powers Staff Registration Standards Training Reform Research Monitor NHS Commissioning Board Health Education England Medical Education England
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk