Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Patel (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 7 November 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, there is no conflict when I use the word ““clinical”” in recognising that it would encompass the totality of clinical and social care. The problem will arise that while the evidence exists to be able to write clinical quality standards, the evidence to write social standards is lacking, and we may have to develop those. That is why a distinction is made between the two. In terms of immediate outcomes for patients that are seen for medical care, the clinical quality standards will make the difference. That does not mean that I do not recognise clinical and well-being together—and I think that all doctors would recognise that. It is not medicalisation that I am after by using the term ““clinically””.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
732 c28 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disability Disclosure of information Codes of practice Equality Health Finance Health professions Learning disability Private sector NHS Patients Older people Negligence National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Standards Rural areas NHS Commissioning Board
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk