Proceeding contribution from Lord Hylton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 November 2011. It occurred during Debate and Debate on select committee report on Subsidiarity Assessment: Food Distribution (EUC Report).
Subsidiarity Assessment: Food Distribution (EUC Report)
My Lords, it is very good to hear the principle of subsidiarity being upheld and defended. I am also inclined to think that this House should be consistent in maintaining the reasoned opinions that it has previously given. The Commission, and perhaps some member states, might like to examine how food stamps in the United States have worked out in practice. The United States probably has less comprehensive and less long-term social welfare arrangements, compared to many European countries. On the other hand, I expect those who devised the food stamp scheme took full account of the interests of commercial food producers and of the market generally. I conclude by asking the Government how many civil servants within the Commission have been employed, or are still employed, in dealing with these matters. If things go ahead in the way that we wish, will some of them no longer be needed? What will happen to them? Having said that, I support the Motion.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c89-90
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disadvantaged Food EU action Procurement Subsidiarity Common agricultural policy Intervention stocks
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:39:00 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789181
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789181
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789181