Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Caroline Nokes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 November 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Park Homes.


Park Homes

It is always a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mrs Main. As a new Member of Parliament in 2010, I did not expect park homes to feature large on my radar. I freely admit that I did not know a great deal about them and that, although I knew that a significant number of park homes were dotted around my constituency, there are more than 200 spread over seven sites. To some colleagues, especially those from the south-west, that will seem a tiny number, but in Romsey and Southampton North it represents a significant and at times vulnerable minority. I pay particular tribute to my constituent, Tim Deacon, a member of the park homes residents association, who has made it his mission over the past 18 months to inform me of the issues facing park home residents. He has endeavoured to educate me and, along with many of his fellow residents—in particular, with another whom I will mention later—he has highlighted their issues and encouraged me to apply for the debate. I am conscious of the fact that the subject affects a lot of hon. Members, many of whom will have far greater expertise than I do. I congratulate the mobile homes all-party parliamentary group on its hard work in drawing attention to the issue and on seeking resolutions to the problems of park home owners. I am also aware that this is only a 30-minute debate, which is a disappointment to some and will not allow all of those Members who have an interest to take part. Many owners of park home sites are fair and upright, especially the deputy leader of my local authority in Test valley, who owns a site in Ampfield. Unfortunately, however, others are not.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
536 c246WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Landlords Park homes Sales Regulation Utilities Unfair practices Security of tenure
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk