Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Public Bodies Bill [Lords].
Public Bodies Bill [Lords]
I beg to move,"That this House does not insist on their Amendment No. 47 to which the Lords have disagreed." Following consideration of Commons amendments in the other place last Wednesday, hon. Members will know that the Government no longer intend to abolish the Youth Justice Board as part of the Bill. Therefore, I will not be asking hon. Members to insist on the Government amendment agreed by this House on Report. The amendment has reintroduced the Youth Justice Board into schedule 1 to the Bill. As my noble friend Lord McNally made clear in the other place, the Government have never waivered in our commitment to maintaining a distinct focus on the needs of children and young people in the youth justice system. We have never proposed to remove youth offending teams or dismantle the dedicated secure estate for young people.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 536 c876
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Coroners Judicial review Public bodies Youth justice Youth Justice Board Chief Coroner
- Legislation
- Public Bodies Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:22:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789735
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789735
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789735