Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 November 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
I am grateful to my noble friend and I was coming on to that very point, which was a question posed by the noble Lord, Lord Warner and others—my noble friend Lord Greaves expatiated on that theme. Our starting point is this: we do not wish to be unduly prescriptive about the size of clinical commissioning groups. There have been widespread variations in the size and population coverage of PCTs and there is no evidence to suggest that there is a single right size. If one looks at the history of the National Health Service over the last 20 years it has been an attempt by successive Governments to find a right size and we never quite succeeded. It is important that solutions develop from the bottom up and are not imposed from above.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c300
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Costs Conflict of interests Health Health services Finance Education Drugs Health professions General practitioners NHS Patients Payments Prescription drugs Older people Misuse Primary care trusts Staff Registration Standards Training Geriatrics Monitor NHS Commissioning Board Clinical commissioning groups
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:22:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_791651
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_791651
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_791651