Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 November 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

Earlier on I noted that the noble Lord drew parallels between CCGs and his attempts when he was a Minister to reduce the number of PCTs. I do feel there is a critical difference. The decision to establish a certain number of PCTs was taken in Richmond House by Ministers. I am not saying those decisions were arbitrary—of course they were not—but they certainly were not bottom-up. With CCGs, the onus is on GP practices to determine the most appropriate size and configuration for their local population. As I have said, the board will then rigorously assess whether this proposal will result in the CCG being able to fulfil its functions. That is a judgment, but it is a proper fitness for purpose test which PCTs never had to go through. I simply do not accept that, come April 2013, there is likely to be a raft of CCGs failing. If a CCG’s proposed constitution is not robust, then it will not receive full authorisation.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c301 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Costs Conflict of interests Health Health services Finance Education Drugs Health professions General practitioners NHS Patients Payments Prescription drugs Older people Misuse Primary care trusts Staff Registration Standards Training Geriatrics Monitor NHS Commissioning Board Clinical commissioning groups
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk