Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Patel (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 November 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, I rise to speak to one amendment in particular. I will be very brief. I support some of the comments made by the noble Baronesses, Lady Hollins and Lady Finlay, about the clinicians’ need to have time where they can contribute to the work of the wider NHS. I strongly support Amendment 210. The noble Lord, Lord Patel of Bradford, gave an excellent example of the value of the JSNA. I wish we could have a similar kind of needs assessment in the community for the care of people with chronic diseases. It might be good to use it to do so. I speak briefly to Amendment 219 about the performance assessment of the clinical commissioning groups. Quite rightly it says that the local health and wellbeing board should be consulted. My amendment asked the question: why not go wider than that? Although I used only the provider as an example of going wider to consult the performance of CCGs, it equally applies to consulting Monitor or even CQC. I look forward to a reply from the Minister as to why it should not be wider than just the health and wellbeing board.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c352 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Costs Conflict of interests Health Health services Finance Education Drugs Health professions General practitioners NHS Patients Payments Prescription drugs Older people Misuse Primary care trusts Staff Registration Standards Training Geriatrics Monitor NHS Commissioning Board Clinical commissioning groups
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk