Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 November 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

Can the Minister define ““reasonable requirements””? What is ““reasonable”” and in whose mind would something be reasonable or unreasonable? Some of us would say that the discrepancies we see emerging now are not reasonable, but they are decisions that are already being made in commissioning. This will become very important because of the financial climate in which the commissioning groups will operate. I would also appreciate knowing who the patient can actually appeal to. The noble Earl has just said in his response that patients can go to judicial review, but the terms of such reviews are tightly drawn and it is a difficult, adversarial process. You have to be a very motivated person to pursue it. But we are talking about patients who are ill, who often are vulnerable and do not have the financial resources needed to undertake such an activity.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c355 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Costs Conflict of interests Health Health services Finance Education Drugs Health professions General practitioners NHS Patients Payments Prescription drugs Older people Misuse Primary care trusts Staff Registration Standards Training Geriatrics Monitor NHS Commissioning Board Clinical commissioning groups
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk