Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 December 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, I think that we are talking about conflicts of interest in two different senses. My problem about conflicts of interest goes back to the accountability point that the Minister touched on. These two or three PCT boards remain accountable at least in part to the people of the area they were appointed to represent. Then there is conflict of interest in the narrower sense. I am chair of the board of the Suffolk Mental Health Partnership. If I had an interest in a private sector mental health outfit, I would obviously declare that and that is normal business. I am talking about a fundamental conflict of interest between the people on these boards and the interests of the people to whom they are supposed to be accountable, wearing three different hats.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c556 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Accountability Death Coroners Advocacy Employment Health Health services Fees and charges Education Health authorities Emergencies Local government Mental illness NHS Public appointments Primary care trusts Mental health services Water supply Trusts Fluoride Dental health Death certificates NHS Commissioning Board Public Health England Clinical commissioning groups
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk