Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 December 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
My Lords, I think that we are moving away from what the amendments originally were about. There now seems to be a general attack on any idea of supervision at all. I am making it clear that we believe that supervision is appropriate but that it is just a question of getting that balance and proportionality right. For that reason, we think that we have got it right and that is why we will consult on the detail, which, as my noble friend Lady Hamwee made clear, was a matter more appropriate for the Bill. I do not think that I can add much more at this stage. I have dealt with the three subgroups of amendments within this group. I very much hope that my noble friend Lady Heyhoe Flint will withdraw her amendment and that the other amendments will not be moved.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c639-40
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Criminal records Crime Employment Licensing Further education Harassment Offenders Personal records Northern Ireland Protection Police cautions Taxis Rehabilitation Registration Vetting Vulnerable adults Young people Safety Sports Voluntary work Stalking Criminal Records Bureau
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:29:31 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_792341
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_792341
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_792341