Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 December 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.


Protection of Freedoms Bill

79: Clause 82, page 73, line 8, leave out ““or B”” and insert ““, B or C”” 80: Clause 82, page 73, line 8, at end insert ““and the arrangements have not ceased to have effect in accordance with a notice given under section 118(3B).”” 81: Clause 82, page 73, line 30, at end insert— ““( ) Condition C is that— (a) the certificate was issued under section 117(2) or 117A(5)(b), and (b) the certificate which it superseded— (i) was subject to up-date arrangements immediately before it was superseded, and (ii) would still be subject to those arrangements had it not been superseded.”” Amendments 79 to 81 agreed. Amendment 82 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c683 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Criminal records Crime Employment Licensing Further education Harassment Offenders Personal records Northern Ireland Protection Police cautions Taxis Rehabilitation Registration Vetting Vulnerable adults Young people Safety Sports Voluntary work Stalking Criminal Records Bureau
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk