Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 December 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.


Welfare Reform Bill

My Lords, this is a technical issue about the level at which people choose and the extent to which we treat universal credit as a bank account—some would argue that that is what it is as regards budgeting advances, for instance—or drop it down into banking apps that will available for people on universal credit. I do not want those flexibilities to apply at the higher level in the formal process. I want those flexibilities, whether they are direct debits or anything else, to apply at a lower level in banking and budgeting products which will float away with people when they are outside universal credit. That is the issue. That is why I do not want my hands to be tied. I do not want to be forced to give the flexibility at the core level, not the lower level. Therefore, I beg the noble Baroness to withdraw the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c1021 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Council tax benefits Disability Children Disability living allowance Child tax credit Devolved matters Benefits rules Carers Bank services Employment Legislative competence Pension credit Low incomes Parents Pensions Payments Universal credit Wales Social security benefits Scotland Welfare tax credits
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk