Proceeding contribution from Andrew Percy (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 December 2011. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention of Nuclear Proliferation.
Prevention of Nuclear Proliferation
That is a different debate for a different day, but I would rather that nuclear weapons were in the hands of the United States or this country than in the Iranian regime's, as it is currently constituted. The hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) commented on the International Atomic Energy Agency report—[Interruption.] I apologise for my croaky throat, Madam Deputy Speaker; it is difficult to get my words out. The hon. Gentleman's conclusions were slightly different from those drawn by others. I want to remind him of a couple of things in that report. Crucially, the report found evidence that Iran has procured"““nuclear related and dual use equipment and materials by military related individuals and entities””;" has developed"““undeclared pathways for the production of nuclear material””;" has acquired"““nuclear weapons development information and documentation from a clandestine nuclear supply network””;" and has worked"““on the development of an indigenous design of a nuclear weapon including the testing of components””." Further evidence is provided by the reports that we have seen about the high explosive test sites, the neutron initiator and the uranium enrichment, which all prove that Iran is closer than ever to a nuclear weapons programme. There has also been the non-co-operation with the IAEA, of course—we know that inspectors are consistently barred from entering Iran. In some cases they have been expelled; in 2007, 38 inspectors were expelled. We can read a great deal into the response of the Iranian regime to the IAEA findings; it simply dismisses them as having been written by people acting on behalf of the United States or its western allies. I do not think that the report's conclusions were quite as the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington suggested. We should be extremely concerned. It is absolutely right that we act as we have been acting and show leadership on the issue. Yes, we would like other European countries to come on board, but acting as we have, along with the United States and Canada, is right for this country and what we are all trying to achieve—Iran never getting hold of a nuclear weapon. I associate myself with many of the comments made in this debate and I endorse the position of the Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 537 c705-6
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Decommissioning Arms control Finance Nuclear weapons Nuclear power Proliferation Sequestration of assets Iran
- Legislation
- Financial Restrictions (Iran) Order 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:03:50 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_794294
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_794294
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_794294