Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

One of the failings of the commission was that it did not have a relationship with local public and patient involvement. The purpose of the amendment which talks about direct election would be to obviate that problem and provide a constraint in terms of whether or not there were going to be overly centralised administrative costs, because the body itself would be accountable to the local bodies that would be the recipient of most of them. My concern and my frank irritation with the commission—which I had no part in at the time—was the suggestion that all the £100 million was somehow used by the central administration. That was not the case. One of the failings of the commission was that it was not accountable and did not have a proper direct relationship with local public and patient involvement. That was a fault both of the way it was constructed in terms of the legislation, for which the Labour Government of the time must take responsibility, and of the way in which the commission chose to work, with the support of the Department of Health at that stage.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c1490 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Children Accountability Accountancy Directors Carers Advocacy Competition law Health Health services Finance Governing bodies Income Local government NHS Patients Primary care trusts NHS trusts Mergers Staff Private patients Standards Reform Monitor Care Quality Commission NHS Commissioning Board Healthwatch England Clinical commissioning groups
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk