Proceeding contribution from James Gray (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords].
London Local Authorities Bill [Lords]
I used a slightly bad example in my previous intervention by citing a big business and talking about McDonald's; my point was the vicarious polluter pays. Let us imagine that a small business, such as a café, is set up on the streets of St Albans, and around its tables there is an increase in litter. Surely the reasonable presumption is that its customers have produced it and, therefore, that the café will have written into the cost of creating the cup of tea and sticky bun a cost to cover clearing up the litter.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 539 c366
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Enforcement Greater London Local government Litter
- Legislation
- London Local Authorities Bill (HL) 2007-08 to 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:09:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803902
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803902
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_803902