Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Grant Shapps (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on Local Government Finance.


Local Government Finance

I see many former local government Ministers in the Chamber, including one or two on the Opposition Benches. They are well aware of a phenomenon that takes place after every provisional local government finance settlement: each authority comes in to explain why it is the worst affected in the country. That reality brings a wry smile to those who have done this job before. To answer the hon. Gentleman's point, I should say that his authority receives a 3.9% reduction in spending power. That is a touch over the average of 3.3% for this year, but it is by no means impossible and nowhere near the 8.8% cut that one or two authorities, including that in the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for Great Yarmouth, are experiencing. As I explained to the hon. Gentleman, before he intervened not having listened to a word that was said, we have again given more weight to levels of need in each council and less weight—this is critical—to per capita distribution. I rather think that that goes to the exact point that the hon. Gentleman asked about.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
540 c365 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Disadvantaged Cost effectiveness Council tax Housing Expenditure Increases Local government finance Referendums Cuts
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk