Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Percy (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.


Welfare Reform Bill

We need to address the failure to provide adequate housing stock in this country. However, I say to my hon. Friend and near neighbour that the Government's proposal is not a way to do so. It is not a simple problem to solve. The crux of the amendment is that if there is suitable accommodation to go into, people should go into it, but just as there is an insufficient number of bigger homes for families, there is an insufficient number of smaller, one-bedroom properties for those groups of people to go into. If we apply the argument that there is no suitable housing for one group of people and we must therefore do something about them, we should also argue that we should not penalise people who are under-occupying if there is no suitable accommodation for them. The sensible element of the Lords amendment is that the penalty kicks in only if people refuse a suitable property. That is eminently fair. Hon. Members must come to their own conclusions, but I will vote accordingly. I look forward to hearing other contributions to the debate.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
540 c761 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disability Children Disability living allowance Housing benefit Foster care Maintenance Reform Social security benefits Social security Social rented housing Housing occupancy Employment and support allowance
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk