Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Trefgarne (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 1 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on House of Lords (Amendment) Bill [HL].


House of Lords (Amendment) Bill [HL]

My Lords, I agree with what my noble friend Lord Steel has just said and will speak to Amendment 2. I hope that is the right procedure. May I explain, in just a few seconds, why I am anxious that service both in the Armed Forces and in the Diplomatic Service should be exempt from the provisions on compulsory leave of absence? In both services, service overseas is part of the conditions of service. If you are in the Army and you are told to go to Afghanistan, you go. If you are in the Diplomatic Service and you are told to serve in Afghanistan, off you go, or you will lose your job. You have no choice. In other public service appointments, that is not necessarily the case. Therefore, these two services should be specially provided for. I will move Amendment 2 in a moment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c1542-3 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Appeals Armed forces Diplomatic service Elections House of Lords House of Commons Disqualification House of Lords composition Exemptions Leave Members Public service Peers Reform Voting rights
Legislation
House of Lords Reform Bill (HL) 2010-12
House of Lords (Amendment) Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk