Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill.
Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill
The answer is that there is a proposal on the table for what is called ““the full tunnel””. I am not as certain now that what is called the full tunnel is the right solution. There is already the tunnel being built in the east—that is well under way—and there is an argument for a smaller tunnel and other measures. I just think we need to satisfy ourselves before we go for the full tunnel that that is the right solution. There are also site issues, of course, but I regard those as secondary, although in my constituency, as in the hon. Gentleman's, they are hugely important to our constituents, not least with a major site being planned in the middle of my constituency affecting thousands of people, thousands of homes and two or three major schools.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 541 c391
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Finance Greater London Infrastructure Government assistance Pollution Water Water charges Water supply Water companies Sewers South West Water Thames Water River Thames South West Social tariffs
- Legislation
- Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:38:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814188
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814188
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814188