Proceeding contribution from Matthew Offord (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill.
Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill
Does the hon. Gentleman agree that our aim is to address some of the environmental problems of the river apart from the death of the fish on which so many people seem to focus, and that because the shorter tunnel would not comply with the urban waste water directive, the whole exercise would be pointless?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 541 c726
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Greater London Infrastructure Government assistance Pollution Water Water charges Water supply Water companies Sewers South West Water Thames Water River Thames South West Social tariffs
- Legislation
- Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:44:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814755
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814755
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814755