Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill (HL).
London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill [Lords]
My hon. Friend makes an important point. If this Bill had not been objected to and had instead received its Second Reading on the nod, it would not have been possible for its promoters to reflect upon clause 17 on pedicabs, for example. They have now had the opportunity to reflect on that, and have reached a different conclusion from their original one.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 541 c807
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Greater London Electric vehicles Local government Transport Pedicabs Charging points
- Legislation
- London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill (HL) 2007-08 to 2013-14
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:54:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814953
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814953
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814953