Proceeding contribution from Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for trying to clarify these matters, but my concern relates to anti-competitive and anti-collaborative being of at least equal status. I would prefer anti-collaborative to be on the face of the Bill. Is the Minister prepared to have a discussion with me after this debate to see whether we could insert some other wording to prevent both anti-collaborative and anti-competitive behaviour? In that way, even when a provider states that it intends to collaborate and that is put down clearly, if it is demonstrated as time goes on that the provider is not fulfilling that, Monitor will have the leverage to say that it was in open competition but the provider has not fulfilled the requirement to collaborate.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c1720
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Competition Competition Commission Health Health services Finance Fees and charges Licensing EU law Local government Private sector NHS Patients Mergers Office of Fair Trading Prices Negligence NHS foundation trusts Young people Regulation Reform Social services Patients' forums Monitor Care Quality Commission NHS Commissioning Board Healthwatch England Clinical commissioning groups
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:36:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_815062
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_815062
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_815062