Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, I speak also to Amendments 182 and 183. There is one simple point to Clause 77: it is there to remove the current legal uncertainty and risk of double jeopardy for foundation trusts under the UK's existing general merger controls. The OFT already has jurisdiction to review foundation trust mergers under the Enterprise Act, but there is legal uncertainty as to when that applies in individual cases. That creates the risk of double jeopardy for foundation trusts under current arrangements, as their mergers are also reviewed by the Co-operation and Competition Panel. Amendments 181 to 183 are minor and technical amendments which make it clear that Clause 77 applies to both completed and anticipated mergers. I will reserve my remarks on the other amendments in the group until I have heard the contributions of the noble Lords who are proposing them. Meanwhile, I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c1733 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Competition Competition Commission Health Health services Finance Fees and charges Licensing EU law Local government Private sector NHS Patients Mergers Office of Fair Trading Prices Negligence NHS foundation trusts Young people Regulation Reform Social services Patients' forums Monitor Care Quality Commission NHS Commissioning Board Healthwatch England Clinical commissioning groups
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk