Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Murphy (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.

Health and Social Care Bill

The noble Lord may be right. If the change in wording applies to how the management behaves but makes no change in clinical priorities—the noble Lord, Lord Kakkar, said that it would not interfere with clinical priorities—I would support it. It is necessary to ensure that management acts like that, as long as it does not cut across the clinical priority that the sickest person comes first, whether private or NHS.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c1928 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disability Children Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Contracts Councillors Competition Conflict of interests Advocacy Employment Health Health services Education Income Learning disability Local government Private sector NHS Patients Membership Older people NHS foundation trusts Private patients Training Young people Reform Social services Patients' forums Speech and language disorders Care Quality Commission Local involvement networks NHS Commissioning Board Healthwatch England Health and wellbeing boards Clinical commissioning groups
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk