Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill.
Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill
There is plenty of water around the Cayman Islands, but that may not be entirely what Thames Water had in mind. I thank the right hon. Gentleman for making clear his concerns. I hope that he and I will both speak on Monday in the debate on the Government's waste water national policy statement, specifically on the issues relating to the Thames tunnel, which concern many of us as Members of Parliament. It is rather distressing that a very small minority of us seem to be concerned about this, yet no fewer than 144 Members, many of whose constituencies are well outside London, but none the less within the Thames Water area, will be directly affected by the huge and ongoing increases in bills to which he refers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 542 c287-8
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Apprentices Greater London Infrastructure Government assistance Pollution Water Water charges Water supply Regulation Water companies Sewers South West Water Thames Water River Thames South West Social tariffs
- Legislation
- Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:09:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_817508
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_817508
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_817508