Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill.


Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill

I do not want to prolong this unnecessarily, but would like to say clearly that my presumption has always been that something needed to be done. I started from the view that the Thames tunnel was the right solution. However, I want to be sure—not just for myself, but for my constituents, for the reasons that have been set out—that we are not about to embark on an expensive project if it is not entirely needed and has not been objectively assessed to be the right solution. Hence, I come to this issue with a ““Let's check and be certain before we press the button”” approach. That was my view before I went to the Binnie meeting and when I came out of it, and it remains my view today.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
542 c301 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Apprentices Greater London Infrastructure Government assistance Pollution Water Water charges Water supply Regulation Water companies Sewers South West Water Thames Water River Thames South West Social tariffs
Legislation
Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk