Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill.
Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill
Does my hon. Friend not accept that legislation is the only mechanism whereby Members can address fundamental issues such as this? Many of us find it quite distressing that Ofwat, as the regulator, is not doing the job that it should be doing in relation to what are fairly high-profile issues. Is he suggesting that we can rely entirely on Ofwat to judge whether debt equity relationships are appropriate? The right hon. Member for Bermondsey and Old Southwark (Simon Hughes) pointed out that although there are distinct guidelines in Ofwat's own documentation, they seem to have been largely ignored by Thames Water, and may well have been ignored by other water companies. Indeed, the same may apply to other regulators which many of us believe are simply not delivering the goods.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 542 c308
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Apprentices Greater London Infrastructure Government assistance Pollution Water Water charges Water supply Regulation Water companies Sewers South West Water Thames Water River Thames South West Social tariffs
- Legislation
- Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:09:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_817541
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_817541
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_817541