Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Gavin Shuker (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill.


Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill

In this final grouping, we seek to improve the Bill by ensuring that the same parliamentary scrutiny is applied to the wide-ranging powers in clause 2 as we sought to introduce for clause 1, and that the benefits of major works are shared with the whole community, not just shareholders. Amendment 2 recognises that the powers in clause 2 for the Government to provide contingent financial support for exceptionally large or complex water and sewerage infrastructure should be subject to proper debate in the House before they are triggered. As I have already said, it is not our desire to frustrate the will of the House; indeed, there is, by and large, consensus across the House that something must be done to correct the issues with the Thames and that the Thames tunnel presents the best solution for that problem. However, I feel that the clause needs to be considered beyond the context of today and the policy statement that I believe will come out in the House on Monday night.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
542 c313 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Apprentices Greater London Infrastructure Government assistance Pollution Water Water charges Water supply Regulation Water companies Sewers South West Water Thames Water River Thames South West Social tariffs
Legislation
Water Industry (Financial Assistance) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk