Proceeding contribution from David Winnick (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 27 March 2012. It occurred during Backbench debate on Assisted Suicide.
Assisted Suicide
I want the law changed, but that does not mean that if the time comes for a vote on the amendment I will not make up my mind accordingly. If I were asked what sort of change I would like, if change were to occur, I would reply that it would be very much along the lines of what happens in Oregon in the United States. In Oregon, which has all the necessary safeguards in place, those with a terminal illness who wish to end their lives—they must have a terminal illness—are allowed to do so. Some may argue that that is a sliding slope, but palliative care was mentioned by the hon. Member for Croydon South and we should bear in mind what has happened in Oregon, where assisted dying has existed since 1994. The number of people who have died naturally in hospices has actually doubled there. So the argument that hundreds or thousands of people would go to their deaths if we were to change the law and allow assisted dying for the terminally ill is a total fiction.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 542 c1371
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crown Prosecution Service Aiding and abetting Euthanasia Prosecutions Suicide Purdy, Debbie
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:31:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_821833
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_821833
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_821833