Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Yasmin Qureshi (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.


Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

But there is nothing to stop them doing so. The legislation should be simple and straightforward: a person's compensation, whatever it might be, should be theirs and the legal costs should be a separate item that they can claim for. If I am awarded damages worth £100,000, I should get £100,000 and not have to pay £25,000 to someone else. Any legal costs should be paid separately by defendants' insurance companies, which are incredibly rich and have loads of money that they can— One hour having elapsed since the commencement of proceedings on the Lords message, the debate was interrupted (Programme Order, 17 April). The Deputy Speaker put forthwith the Question already proposed from the Chair (Standing Order No. 83G),"That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1B." The House divided: Ayes 300, Noes 222.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c845 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Compensation Damages Asbestos Fees and charges Legal aid scheme Domestic abuse Insurance Legal costs Industrial diseases Mesothelioma Financial procedure Lord Chancellor
Legislation
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk