Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Crispin Blunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive).


Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive)

I will deal with that, but in deciding whether to exercise the opt-out, the Government looked at the most pessimistic reading of events. The conclusion to which my right hon. Friend refers has been before the European Scrutiny Committee, but that impact assessment does not take into account some of the consequences that would flow if we exercised an opt-out. I shall talk about those consequences later in my speech, but they include negotiating all the bilateral data protection arrangements that would be required were we not party to the directive. Having held the responsibility of Europe Minister, my right hon. Friend, of all people in this House, will understand the complexity of the legal basis—complexity that has increased considerably since he and I were serving in the Foreign Office together, I as a special adviser and he as a Minister. If he will forgive me, I will get my arguments on the record, give right hon. and hon. Members the opportunity to contribute in the light of that, then respond to their remarks at the end of the debate. I will therefore resist taking too many interventions. This area is complex enough without adding further to that complexity—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c884-5 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Data protection Databases Criminal records Crime prevention Criminal investigation Cross border cooperation EU countries EU law International cooperation Police Schengen Agreement
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk