Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Crispin Blunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive).


Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive)

If we were outside the directive, our ability to negotiate essential data-sharing agreements, such as we are in the process of doing on the passenger name records directive and the European Union third-country passenger name records agreements, could be significantly undermined. Equally fundamental, exercising our opt-out on this measure could throw our participation in other, broader Schengen measures into question and the Council could take the decision not allow us to continue to participate in valuable data-sharing arrangements under the police co-operation provisions of Schengen. This would be a serious problem for our law enforcement agencies, which benefit from the sharing of criminal data under Schengen. It is therefore our careful collective judgment, based on the most pessimistic view of costs and benefits, shared with the European Scrutiny Committee, that our national interests are best served by participating in this directive so that we are party to the framework governing data-sharing for policing and criminal justice across the European Union.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c887 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Data protection Databases Criminal records Crime prevention Criminal investigation Cross border cooperation EU countries EU law International cooperation Police Schengen Agreement
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk