Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Crispin Blunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive).


Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive)

Let us be clear about what is at stake here. Rules enabling the sharing of data have made a tangible difference to the United Kingdom, and we take steps that imperil them at our risk and at risk to our citizens. Let me give an example, which concerned a 32-year-old Romanian national who was arrested in the United Kingdom on suspicion of raping two women within the Metropolitan area. A request for conviction data identified that the suspect had a previous conviction for rape in Romania. Just prior to the trial, the individual disputed the Romanian conviction, but through close liaison with the central authority and the police liaison officer at the Romanian embassy in London, a set of fingerprints relating to the Romanian rape conviction was obtained and proved the conviction beyond doubt when they matched against the suspect. An application to use the previous conviction as bad character evidence was made by the prosecuting counsel and was granted by the judge, allowing the Romanian rape conviction to be put before the jury. The defendant was convicted of four counts of rape and other offences at the Inner London Crown court in July 2010. The defendant was given an indeterminate prison sentence, with a recommendation that he serve at least 11 years in jail as he presents a ““high risk”” of further sexual offences. The investigating officer on the case said:"““The use of foreign conviction data can be of great importance to police investigations. In my case, by working with the UK Central Authority I was able to draw on their professionalism and expertise to secure details of””—" the individual's—"““previous conviction for rape in Romania which was put before the court and used as bad character evidence. This information undoubtedly assisted in providing a successful outcome, convicting a dangerous offender who will now spend a considerable number of years behind bars.””" Perhaps I hope that under European Union and Council of Europe prisoner transfer agreements, a good proportion of those years will be spent behind Romanian bars, but if I follow that up, I may be diverging from the immediate subject of the debate.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c887-8 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Data protection Databases Criminal records Crime prevention Criminal investigation Cross border cooperation EU countries EU law International cooperation Police Schengen Agreement
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk