Proceeding contribution from Crispin Blunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive).
Data Protection in the Areas of Police and Criminal Justice (EU Directive)
No. Let me turn to the substantial content of the proposed directive and the policy issues that are raised. We want to see a system that allows police and judicial authorities to continue to protect and serve the public effectively and which also allows individuals to be confident that their privacy, safety and freedom will be safeguarded. The Government believe that these two objectives are not contradictory, but may be achieved in tandem, by creating a data protection framework that is founded on the principles of necessity and proportionality. In the light of this position, there are legitimate concerns regarding the content of the directive. The United Kingdom believes in a principles-based approach that allows the necessary amount of flexibility in processing data. In some areas, the proposed directive seems far too prescriptive to meet this requirement.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 543 c889
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Data protection Databases Criminal records Crime prevention Criminal investigation Cross border cooperation EU countries EU law International cooperation Police Schengen Agreement
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:01:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_825184
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_825184
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_825184