Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.


Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

That this House do not insist on its Amendments 2B and 196B to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 196C. 196C Because it is appropriate for provision about evidence of abuse for the purposes of an application for civil legal services described in paragraph 10 or 11 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 to be made by regulations.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c1802 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Compensation Disadvantaged Damages Asbestos Legal aid scheme Domestic abuse Industrial diseases Public expenditure Mesothelioma Social security benefits Financial procedure
Legislation
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk