Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 18 July 2006, in the House of Lords, led by Baroness Ashton of Upholland. The answering member was Lord Kingsland.

Criminal Defence Service (Representation Orders and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2006

Draft SI on criminal defence service (representation orders and consequential amendments) (SI 2006/2493). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft SIs on criminal defence service (financial eligibility) and criminal defence service (representation orders: appeals etc). Lords Grand Committee (Moses Room).

Secondary information

Type: Parliamentary proceeding
Reference: 684 c45-55GC
Session: 2005-06
Department: Department for Constitutional Affairs
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords Grand Committee
Related items: Criminal Defence Service (Representation Orders: Appeals etc ) Regulations 2006
Thursday, 22 June 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords; Criminal Defence Service (Representation Orders and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2006
Thursday, 22 June 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords; Criminal Defence Service (Financial Eligibility) Regulations 2006
Thursday, 22 June 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions: Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 684 c45-8GC (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Criminal De...; Lord Kingsland | 684 c48-50GC (Link to this contribution) First, I thank the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Ashton, for giving us such a clear exposition ...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 684 c52-4GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lords, Lord Kingsland and Lord Thomas of Gresford, for the spirit in which they ha...; Lord Thomas of Gresford | 684 c50-1GC (Link to this contribution) I, too, thank the noble Baroness for her exposition of these three sets of regulations relating to t...; Lord Thomas of Gresford | 684 c51-2GC (Link to this contribution) I may as well say that—we all know what interests I have to declare. My point is that a case well pu...
Subjects: Criminal proceedings Appeals Applications Criminal Defence Service Finance Fees and charges Legal aid scheme Eligibility Legal representation Legal Services Commission Legal costs Magistrates' courts Means-tested benefits
Legislation: Criminal Defence Service (Financial Eligibility) Regulations 2006; Criminal Defence Service (Representation Orders and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2006; Criminal Defence Service (Representation Orders: Appeals etc.) Regulations 2006
Link: View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk

Criminal Defence Service (Representation Orders and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2006

Secondary information

Librarians' tools