Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Tuesday, 20 March 2007, in the House of Lords.

Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill [HL]

Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 6 agreed to. Schedule agreed to. bill reported without amendment.

Secondary information

Type: Parliamentary proceeding
Reference: 690 c1204-9
Session: 2006-07
Legislative stage: Committee stage
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Related items: Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill (HL). Explanatory Notes HL Bill 29-EN also published.
Tuesday, 23 January 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions: Lord Norton of Louth | 690 c1205 (Link to this contribution) I support my noble friend’s amendment, which I touched on at Second Reading. On the face of it, an a...; Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1204-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 2 , page 2, line 5, leave out ““Commission”” The noble Lord said...; Baroness Amos | 690 c1204 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved acc...; Lord McNally | 690 c1206 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment. I speak as someone who strongly supports the idea of joint operations betwe...; Lord Norton of Louth | 690 c1206 (Link to this contribution) I support my noble friend’s amendment. I added my name to it because it is a sensible way of address...; Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1205-6 (Link to this contribution) I must first apologise if I appeared to be treating the Lord President as though she were speaking f...; Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1206 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 2: 2: After Clause 2 , insert the following new Clause— ““Annual report A join...; Baroness Amos | 690 c1209 (Link to this contribution) I am happy to say that both Houses would have to be satisfied. That is absolutely the case.; Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1208-9 (Link to this contribution) I acknowledged that, so far as the Bill and the arrangements under it apply only to PICT, this is pr...; Baroness Amos | 690 c1208 (Link to this contribution) Again, I appreciate and understand the point that the noble Lord seeks to address through the amendm...; Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1207-8 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 3: 3: Clause 3 , page 2, line 18, leave out ““both”” and insert ““each of the”...; Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1207 (Link to this contribution) I seem to have support in principle from all three major parties in the House. As I confessed when m...; Baroness Amos | 690 c1206-7 (Link to this contribution) I have some sympathy with the spirit of the amendment proposed. The noble Lord, Lord Cope, is quite ...; Lord Cope of Berkeley | 690 c1209 (Link to this contribution) That makes my position much easier. As ““both”” seems to mean much the same as ““each””, I beg leave...; Baroness Amos | 690 c1205 (Link to this contribution) I think that it would be helpful to clarify that this is not a government Bill. I am taking the Bill...
Subjects: Conditions of employment Administration ICT House of Lords House of Commons Staff Parliament Working hours Parliamentary Information and Communications Technology Service
Legislation: Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link: View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk

Parliament (Joint Departments) Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools