Debates on delegated legislation on Monday, 1 February 2010, in the House of Lords, led by Lord McKenzie of Luton. The answering member was Lord Bates.

Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010

Draft Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Secondary information

Type: Parliamentary proceeding
Reference: 717 c27-36GC
Session: 2009-10
Department: Department for Communities and Local Government
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords Grand Committee
Related items: Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010
Monday, 8 February 2010
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords; Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010
Tuesday, 5 January 2010
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions: Lord Jenkin of Roding | 717 c31-3GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I reassure the Minister that I intend to make a very much shorter speech than I did last w...; Lord Jenkin of Roding | 717 c33-4GC (Link to this contribution) I entirely understand that the noble Lord did not take part in the debates on the Planning Bill when...; Lord Jenkin of Roding | 717 c35GC (Link to this contribution) May we take it that the road map is comprehensive and accurate, and does not need further updating?; Baroness Hamwee | 717 c31GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am standing in for my noble friend Lord Tope. He would have liked to be here as he is le...; Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c33GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I start by thanking all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate. I also thank all ...; Lord Bates | 717 c30-1GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the regulations are straightforward but I have a few questions on which I seek clarificati...; Lord Bates | 717 c34GC (Link to this contribution) I like the way the Minister has explained the sentence to which I referred, but does he not accept t...; Lord Bates | 717 c35GC (Link to this contribution) That was not what I asked. I asked whether anything in the current order was different from what was...; Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c28-9GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, these regulations are of a technical nature and, while they are straightforward and uncont...; Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c27GC (Link to this contribution) That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Infrastructure Planning (...; Baroness Hamwee | 717 c33GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, before the Minister responds, the noble Lord has just referred to meeting Sir Michael Pitt...; Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c35-6GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I understand that it may be updated again. It is accurate as of today, but these are compl...; Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c34GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord for that clarification. He is correct: both Houses will have the opp...; Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c35GC (Link to this contribution) No, nothing changed as a result of the consultation in this case on this quite narrow order. The no...; Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c34-5GC (Link to this contribution) It is a statement of fact, but if the noble Lord feels it could have been better worded, I accept hi...
Subjects: Applications Infrastructure Ministerial powers Planning Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
Legislation: Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010
Link: View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk

Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010

Secondary information

Librarians' tools