Skip to main content

1-20 of 24 results for legtitle:"Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That the draft regulations laid before the House on 5 January be approved. Relevant document: 4th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, considered in Grand Committee on 1 February. Motion agreed.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2010
Reference
717 c480
House
House of Lords

Draft Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010. Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question (formal).

Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
8 February 2010
Reference
717 c480
House
House of Lords

Draft Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010. Deferred division on a motion to approve. Agreed to on division. (231 to 196).

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
505 c424-7
House
House of Commons

Draft Gambling Act 2005 (Operating Licence Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2010; draft Passengers' Council (Non-Railway Functions) Order 2010. Motions to approve. Agreed to on question. Draft Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010. Objection taken. Division deferred until 3 February. Agreed to on division (231 to 196).

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
505 c272-3
House
House of Commons

My Lords, these regulations are of a technical nature and, while they are straightforward and uncontroversial, serve an important function. They ensure that decisions taken by the Infrastructure Planning Commission, the IPC, will be taken on the same basis that planning decisions are taken now. Perhaps I may provide some...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c28-9GC
House
House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010. Relevant Document: 4th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c27GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister responds, the noble Lord has just referred to meeting Sir Michael Pitt. I would not like him to think that the praise and admiration for the work he is doing comes from only one part of this House. Colleagues and I also met him and...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c33GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand that it may be updated again. It is accurate as of today, but these are complicated matters. I understand the importance of having certainty for people who are going to make applications to the IPC. The noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, asked whether the department was producing...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c35-6GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for that clarification. He is correct: both Houses will have the opportunity to scrutinise NPSs, and I understand the point he makes in respect of the role of that scrutiny. The noble Lord, Lord Bates, said that the primary legislation is somehow defective...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c34GC
House
House of Lords

No, nothing changed as a result of the consultation in this case on this quite narrow order. The noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, asked about other instruments to be laid. Everything that needs to be laid to be in place on 1 March has already been laid, including the order before...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c35GC
House
House of Lords

It is a statement of fact, but if the noble Lord feels it could have been better worded, I accept his point. The key point seem to be to be clear on what the system is meant to produce and why it is an improvement on the current arrangements. The...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c34-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am standing in for my noble friend Lord Tope. He would have liked to be here as he is learning fast about the Infrastructure Planning Commission. I picked up on the same words that were used by the Minister as the noble Lord, Lord Bates, did, when...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c31GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the regulations are straightforward but I have a few questions on which I seek clarification from the Minister for the record. Our position was set out by my honourable friend Stewart Jackson when the matter was considered in Committee in another place. We have serious concerns about the...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c30-1GC
House
House of Lords

I like the way the Minister has explained the sentence to which I referred, but does he not accept that the way it is phrased, ""Questioning at hearings will be led by commissioners rather than being adversarial"," could have been better?

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c34GC
House
House of Lords

That was not what I asked. I asked whether anything in the current order was different from what was in the original order that was consulted on.

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c35GC
House
House of Lords

I entirely understand that the noble Lord did not take part in the debates on the Planning Bill when it was going through this House. Of course, the national policy statements have to be scrutinised by both Houses of Parliament. You would not necessarily appreciate that if you looked at...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c33-4GC
House
House of Lords

May we take it that the road map is comprehensive and accurate, and does not need further updating?

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c35GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I reassure the Minister that I intend to make a very much shorter speech than I did last week when he and I confronted each other about the carbon emissions target scheme. Like my noble friend Lord Bates, I have one or two questions. However, I shall preface...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c31-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate. I also thank all noble Lords who have primarily focused on the detail of this measure, notwithstanding the declared and well recognised position of the respective parties in respect of the thrust of the legislation....

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c33GC
House
House of Lords

Draft Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Answering member
Lord Bates
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c27-36GC
House
House of Lords