Skip to main content

Debates on delegated legislation on Monday, 14 March 2011, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Freud. The answering member was Lord McKenzie of Luton.


Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2011

Draft Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2011. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011.


Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
726 c74-94 
Session
2010-12
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Related items
Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011
Thursday, 3 February 2011
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2011
Thursday, 3 February 2011
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Beecham | 726 c84-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow my noble friend Lady Lister, who has for many years been a lead...
Lord German | 726 c85-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, perhaps I may follow that speech by the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, by also declaring an int...
Show all contributions (16)
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 726 c78-82 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing these orders and for that journey through geometric m...
Baroness Lister of Burtersett | 726 c82-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I wish to speak particularly on the shift from the RPI to the CPI. The Minister in the oth...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 726 c87 (Link to this contribution) I hope that the noble Lord will forgive me for interrupting. I accept what he says about the triple ...
Lord German | 726 c87 (Link to this contribution) The basic pension is bigger than the additional pension. In the long run, the earnings link is worth...
Lord Freud | 726 c74 (Link to this contribution) Moved By That the draft order laid before the House on 3 February be approved. Relevant documents...
Lord Freud | 726 c75-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I also speak to the draft Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011. I am satisfied ...
Lord Freud | 726 c91-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this has been an interesting debate, as one would hope and expect. I thank noble Lords for...
Lord Lea of Crondall | 726 c93 (Link to this contribution) Can I just point out that that is by no means the whole argument about the merits of the RPI?
Lord Freud | 726 c93-4 (Link to this contribution) It is an attempt to find an explanation for why our RPI is so different from the CPI compared with o...
Lord German | 726 c87-8 (Link to this contribution) I was very grateful that the Government did not put the override in place, because of course it shou...
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope | 726 c88-90 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I should like to make a few comments at the end of what is always a very important annual ...
Lord Lea of Crondall | 726 c90-1 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may say how interesting I find the noble Lord’s analysis of the difference between the RPI...
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope | 726 c91 (Link to this contribution) I certainly think that that is a good idea and I would support it.
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 726 c87 (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord again, but how would he factor into his assessment occupation...
Subjects
Child benefit Council tax Increases Inflation Social security benefits State retirement pensions Uprating Consumer prices index
Legislation
Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011
Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2011
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk