Skip to main content

1-20 of 126 results for legtitle:"Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I also speak to the draft Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011. I am satisfied that the orders are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. The Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order provides for contracted-out defined benefit schemes to increase their members’ guaranteed minimum pensions that accrued...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c75-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been an interesting debate, as one would hope and expect. I thank noble Lords for their valued contributions. I should probably declare an interest in that I am due a winter fuel payment this year, although I did not get it. The DWP says that it...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c91-3
House
House of Lords

Can I just point out that that is by no means the whole argument about the merits of the RPI?

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c93
House
House of Lords

It is an attempt to find an explanation for why our RPI is so different from the CPI compared with other countries. I was just looking for a clue to answer the rather potent question asked by my noble friend. It was not a complete answer, but I tried to...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c93-4
House
House of Lords

I was very grateful that the Government did not put the override in place, because of course it should be up to occupational pension schemes to make up their own minds according to their rules. Clearly, if RPI were written into the contract that already existed, that would apply and...

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c87-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like to make a few comments at the end of what is always a very important annual occasion. There have been occasions in the past when colleagues in the House have not considered it appropriate to look at social security benefit uprating orders, but these orders...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c88-90
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may say how interesting I find the noble Lord’s analysis of the difference between the RPI and the CPI. Some 30 years ago, I was a member of the RPI advisory committee when it had a great row with the Treasury about mortgage interest payments. The philosophical argument...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c90-1
House
House of Lords

I certainly think that that is a good idea and I would support it.

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c91
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord again, but how would he factor into his assessment occupational pensions which, in terms of future indexation, could be subject to CPI rather than RPI?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c87
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow my noble friend Lady Lister, who has for many years been a leading advocate of improving living conditions for many people and who has made a distinguished contribution to national debate. Like perhaps only a few noble Lords present, but like perhaps...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c84-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may follow that speech by the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, by also declaring an interest. I am in receipt of my basic state pension and I suppose that I should be thanking the Minister for his announcement that I will be earning, on average, £15,000 or...

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c85-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing these orders and for that journey through geometric means, elasticity of demand and Cobb-Douglas. I am certainly reassured to know that the geometric mean works only at the elementary aggregate level. He has certainly given us plenty to read this evening in...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c78-82
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to speak particularly on the shift from the RPI to the CPI. The Minister in the other place acknowledged that no single index is perfect, and the noble Lord, Lord Freud, said something similar this evening. Given that, I argue that the criterion that we should...

Member
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c82-4
House
House of Lords

I hope that the noble Lord will forgive me for interrupting. I accept what he says about the triple lock on the basic state pension, but does he acknowledge that applying CPI to S2P on a long-term basis would reduce what would otherwise be payable?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c87
House
House of Lords

The basic pension is bigger than the additional pension. In the long run, the earnings link is worth 2 per cent more than prices, and CPI is 0.8 per cent less than RPI. Therefore, the increase in the basic state pension can be set against the change which will occur...

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c87
House
House of Lords

Moved By That the draft order laid before the House on 3 February be approved. Relevant documents: 16th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments.

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c74
House
House of Lords

Draft Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2011. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011.

Lead member
Lord Freud
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c74-94
House
House of Lords

It is nice to see such a large crowd of Members in the Chamber for this debate. I have attended benefits uprating debates for a number of years, and there are usually three people, possibly including one who really likes statistics, sitting somewhere on the Back Benches. As the Minister...

Member
Anne Begg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 February 2011
Reference
523 c1194-5
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady agree that even under CPI, because the coalition Government are linking it with earnings, that would be the equivalent over a full term of an additional £15,000 to someone's pension pot?

Member
Stephen Lloyd (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 February 2011
Reference
523 c1195
House
House of Commons

But that is assuming that the only income that pensioners have is the basic state pension, which is not the case. Most pensioners supplement the basic state pension with an occupational pension or, if they worked in the public sector, with a public sector pension. That is where the Government...

Member
Anne Begg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 February 2011
Reference
523 c1195
House
House of Commons