Ministerial statement on Wednesday, 18 May 2011, in the House of Commons, led by Liam Fox.
Nuclear Deterrent
Statement on the nuclear deterrent programme.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 528 c351-63
- Session
- 2010-12
- Department
- Ministry of Defence
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Related items
-
Deposited Paper DEP2011-0825
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
Deposited papers
House of Lords
House of Commons
-
Vulcan Naval Reactor Test Establishment
Wednesday, 2 November 2011
Written statements
House of Commons
-
UK's Future Nuclear Deterrent (Update)
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Written statements
House of Commons
-
The United Kingdom’s Future Nuclear Deterrent 2014 Update to Parliament
Thursday, 18 December 2014
Written statements
House of Commons
-
Future Nuclear Deterrent - 2016 Update to Parliament
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
Written statements
House of Commons
-
Future Nuclear Deterrent: 2017 Update to Parliament
Wednesday, 20 December 2017
Written statements
House of Commons
-
The United Kingdom's Future Nuclear Deterrent: 2018 Update to Parliament
Thursday, 20 December 2018
Written statements
House of Commons
-
Future Nuclear Deterrent Annual Update 2019
Friday, 20 December 2019
Written statements
House of Commons
-
Future Nuclear Deterrent Annual Update 2020
Thursday, 17 December 2020
Written statements
House of Commons
- Proceeding contributions
-
Julian Lewis | 528 c357 (Link to this contribution) I am really rather worried that my right hon. Friend is in danger of inflicting cruel and unusual pu...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c357 (Link to this contribution) I rather fear that my hon. Friend is a little too late. Having made my hon. Friend the Minister for ...
-
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem | 528 c355 (Link to this contribution) My right hon. Friend is well known for his independence and openness of mind, as was shown by his re...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c356 (Link to this contribution) I have always thought that our independence of mind was why we were sent to the House of Commons in ...
-
Bob Ainsworth | 528 c356 (Link to this contribution) On costs, does the Secretary of State accept that since the election two things, effectively, have g...
-
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom | 528 c356 (Link to this contribution) Whatever my right hon. Friend's openness of mind, does he personally agree that the real choice is b...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c356 (Link to this contribution) I have made it clear on a number of occasions why I believe that having a ballistic, submarine-based...
-
Jeremy Corbyn | 528 c357 (Link to this contribution) This is a very depressing statement today. First, the Secretary of State gave us no indication of th...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c357 (Link to this contribution) I appreciate the sincerity of the hon. Gentleman's views; I just profoundly disagree with them. As I...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c359 (Link to this contribution) What I am making clear today is that for the rest of this Parliament we will be going ahead with the...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c358 (Link to this contribution) We have a number of ways of ensuring the protection of our deterrent and, as my hon. Friend says, he...
-
Angus Robertson | 528 c358 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Secretary of State for advance notice of his statement. He is well aware that majority o...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c358 (Link to this contribution) This has always been at the heart of the deterrent argument. The whole point is that there is uncert...
-
Peter Tapsell | 528 c358 (Link to this contribution) Without, obviously, asking the Secretary of State to go into any sort of detail, will he make absolu...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c358-9 (Link to this contribution) There are realities of coalition government that simply have to be faced. As part of the coalition a...
-
Lord Walney | 528 c359 (Link to this contribution) The Secretary of State knows that approval of initial gate is overdue and it is good that more work ...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c358 (Link to this contribution) It would be hard to make a less eloquent case for Scottish independence! It is important that we rec...
-
James Gray | 528 c358 (Link to this contribution) It is of course always open for any political party or any part of any political party to take a dif...
-
Joan Ruddock | 528 c357-8 (Link to this contribution) Given the phenomenal cost of this weapons system and given that we will commit future generations to...
-
Sheila Gilmore | 528 c363 (Link to this contribution) The Secretary of State indicated that the costs between now and 2016 were containable within his bud...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c362 (Link to this contribution) I am just a little stumped by the logic of that. We announced some time ago that we are reducing the...
-
Jim Shannon | 528 c363 (Link to this contribution) I welcome the Secretary of State's statement. He mentioned that the programme was of great national ...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c363 (Link to this contribution) The short answer is yes, but what I said was that a proportion of the costs that I outlined today, w...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c363 (Link to this contribution) Clearly, the costs of the British deterrent fall upon the British taxpayer, the costs of the French ...
-
Stephen Metcalfe | 528 c362 (Link to this contribution) I, too, welcome the statement from my right hon. Friend and his full commitment to future investment...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c362 (Link to this contribution) We will spread the costs wherever we are achieving our objective industrially, which is sustainabili...
-
Andrew Love | 528 c362 (Link to this contribution) The Secretary of State seems to believe that simply by reducing the number of weapons, he is complyi...
-
Nick Smith | 528 c360 (Link to this contribution) May I press the Secretary of State on his decision to introduce a study to assist the Liberal Democr...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c360 (Link to this contribution) I entirely agree with my hon. Friend. I wonder how many in the House predicted the Arab spring or wh...
-
Rehman Chishti | 528 c360 (Link to this contribution) May I first welcome the statement by the Secretary of State? Does he agree that the United Kingdom's...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c360 (Link to this contribution) I repeat the answer I have already given to this question. I have already said that the costs are co...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c359-60 (Link to this contribution) In making reductions that go further than necessary we are, as I have already said, not only within ...
-
Mike Gapes | 528 c359 (Link to this contribution) The Secretary of State said in a small phrase in his statement that ““if the time is right””, we cou...
-
James Morris | 528 c360 (Link to this contribution) The Secretary of State said that it is difficult for us to predict events that will happen in the fu...
-
Bob Stewart | 528 c359 (Link to this contribution) Does my right hon. Friend agree that the independent nuclear deterrent is being used all the time be...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c359 (Link to this contribution) I cannot fault my hon. Friend's logic. He understands the whole basis of the concept of deterrence. ...
-
Cathy Jamieson | 528 c362 (Link to this contribution) Does the Secretary of State understand that many people will find it shocking that we are talking ab...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c361-2 (Link to this contribution) There is a certain read-across from the Astute to the Trident replacement and the UK should certainl...
-
Martin Horwood | 528 c361 (Link to this contribution) I welcome the study of alternatives. It would be a shame to waste that initial investment should a s...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c361 (Link to this contribution) I look forward to a world in which the nuclear threat is being reduced, and we are reducing our nucl...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c361 (Link to this contribution) The point of our nuclear deterrent is to deter a nuclear threat to the United Kingdom from wherever ...
-
Robert Halfon | 528 c361 (Link to this contribution) Does my right hon. Friend accept that the main plank of deterrence is mutually assured destruction b...
-
Thomas Docherty | 528 c360 (Link to this contribution) The Secretary of State has demonstrated that he is a principled and honourable man. Does he therefor...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c360-1 (Link to this contribution) I am not entirely sure that I grasped the essence of the hon. Gentleman's question. We will have con...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c360 (Link to this contribution) I do not think that having a nuclear deterrent does anything to diminish the status of the United Ki...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c351-3 (Link to this contribution) With permission, Mr Speaker, I should like to make a statement on our nuclear deterrent programme. ...
-
Jim Murphy | 528 c353-4 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Secretary of State both for his statement and for providing advance sight of it. I join ...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c355 (Link to this contribution) I shall do my best to answer the long list of questions that the right hon. Gentleman asked. I shall...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c356 (Link to this contribution) The costs of the alternatives review are met from existing departmental budgets and no additional co...
-
Liam Fox | 528 c362 (Link to this contribution) I have never accepted the arrogant attitude that there is no moral case for a deterrent. I can appre...
-
Caroline Lucas | 528 c361 (Link to this contribution) The Secretary of State rightly says that the ““first duty of any Government is to ensure the securit...
- Subjects
- Costs Nuclear weapons Procurement Nuclear disarmament Safety Nuclear submarines
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all related items (11)
Show all contributions (51)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 20:58:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_92994
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_92994
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_92994